Guatemalan vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Guatemalans
Bahamians
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,589,655 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88176/8817698994adb00e7e2bfcb594e2b32ef4862f7d" alt="Guatemalan vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household"
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Bahamian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 35.5% | 21.9% |
Range | 33.2% | 20.5% |
Mean | 11.7% | 9.3% |
Median | 10.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |