South African vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
South African
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
South Africans
Bahamians
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,340,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 21.9% |
| Range | 98.5% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Median | 6.2% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.48%), New Zealander (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Uganda (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |