Nicaraguan vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Nicaraguans
Bahamians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,349,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 21.9% |
| Range | 27.9% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 9.3% |
| Median | 8.2% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |