Immigrants from Uganda vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
New Zealander
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
New Zealanders
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,911,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.97% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 19.1% |
Range | 20.9% | 17.7% |
Mean | 8.5% | 5.9% |
Median | 7.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and New Zealanders by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |