Immigrants from Uganda vs Nicaraguan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Nicaraguan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Nicaraguans
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Nicaraguan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,911,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,349,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 0.97% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 28.8% |
Range | 20.9% | 27.9% |
Mean | 8.5% | 9.2% |
Median | 7.7% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Nicaraguans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.77%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.82%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |