Lumbee vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Lumbee
New Zealander
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Lumbee
New Zealanders
10.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
54.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,166,207 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 28.8% | 19.1% |
Range | 26.8% | 17.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 5.9% |
Median | 9.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and New Zealanders by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Latin America (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Indonesian (10.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (10.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |