Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
90.1%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
90.2%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,961,827 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 90.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,752,092 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.443 and weighted average of 90.2%, a difference of 0.17%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 78.1% | 62.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.9% | 37.5% |
Mean | 92.2% | 93.4% |
Median | 92.7% | 94.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 89.9% | 92.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 96.2% | 97.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are New Zealander (90.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (90.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Tlingit-Haida (90.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Australian (90.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Estonians | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 90.3% |
Sudanese | 85.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 90.3% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 81.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 90.2% |
Sioux | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 90.2% |
Bahamians | 80.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 90.2% |
Chileans | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 90.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 78.2 /100 | #148 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 76.7 /100 | #149 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 75.4 /100 | #151 | Good 90.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 74.3 /100 | #152 | Good 90.1% |
New Zealanders | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 73.8 /100 | #154 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 90.1% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #156 | Good 90.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 71.2 /100 | #157 | Good 90.0% |
Brazilians | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 90.0% |
South Africans | 69.7 /100 | #159 | Good 90.0% |