Immigrants from Moldova vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Estonians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,267,195 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.12%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Estonian |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 47.6% |
| Range | 23.8% | 46.8% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |