Immigrants from Bahamas vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Estonians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,565,234 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.76%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Estonian |
Minimum | 0.94% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 18.0% | 47.6% |
Range | 17.1% | 46.8% |
Mean | 8.5% | 7.0% |
Median | 8.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |