Spanish American Indian vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Estonians
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,126,627 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Estonian |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 47.6% |
| Range | 15.2% | 46.8% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |