Burmese vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Burmese
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Burmese
Estonians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,501,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Estonian |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 28.5% | 47.6% |
| Range | 28.0% | 46.8% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 7.0% |
| Median | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |