Immigrants from Moldova vs Burmese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Burmese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Burmese
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Burmese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,267,195 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,501,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 28.5% |
| Range | 23.8% | 28.0% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Burmese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |