Guatemalan vs Uruguayan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Uruguayan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Guatemalans
Uruguayans
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Uruguayan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,589,655 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,673,371 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 16.9% |
| Range | 33.2% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 7.7% |
| Median | 10.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Uruguayans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from South America (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Peruvian (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Zaire (11.2%, a difference of 0.75%), Argentinean (11.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (11.2%, a difference of 0.89%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 10.6 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 10.6 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 10.2 /100 | #217 | Poor 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 10.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Argentineans | 9.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Peruvians | 8.4 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | South America | 8.0 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Uruguayans | 7.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.3% |