Cuban vs New Zealander 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cuban
New Zealander
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cubans
New Zealanders
56.3%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.7%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs New Zealander 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,997,187 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 56.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,900,392 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 56.7%, a difference of 0.67%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 30.1% | 35.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.7% |
| Range | 69.9% | 53.9% |
| Mean | 57.8% | 67.4% |
| Median | 57.5% | 67.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.0% | 60.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.9% | 75.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and New Zealanders by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Salvadoran (56.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (56.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Latvian (56.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Blackfeet (56.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Tsimshian (56.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
| Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Armenians | 84.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Latvians | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 56.2% |