Cuban vs Costa Rican 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cuban
Costa Rican
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cubans
Costa Ricans
56.3%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.9%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Costa Rican 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,997,187 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 56.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,480,816 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 56.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 30.1% | 29.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.2% |
| Range | 69.9% | 61.7% |
| Mean | 57.8% | 60.8% |
| Median | 57.5% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.0% | 54.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.9% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Costa Ricans by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Salvadoran (56.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (56.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (56.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Comanche (56.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Native/Alaskan (57.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (57.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Sioux (56.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Asians | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 57.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 95.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 57.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
| Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |