Cuban vs New Zealander Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Cuban
New Zealander
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Cubans
New Zealanders
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
12.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs New Zealander Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,752,721 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,880,294 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.418 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.15%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 46.4% | 55.8% |
| Range | 36.4% | 52.1% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 26.4% |
| Median | 26.5% | 26.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and New Zealanders by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.030%), African (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Dominica (27.2%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pima (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
| Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
| Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
| Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
| Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
| Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
| Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
| New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |