Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
 Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
86.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,291,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
 
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 8.2% | 13.8% | 
| Range | 6.6% | 11.8% | 
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 5.0% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 86.3 /100 | #134  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 86.2 /100 | #135  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 86.2 /100 | #136  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 85.6 /100 | #137  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 85.6 /100 | #138  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Pakistanis | 85.3 /100 | #139  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 84.3 /100 | #140  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147  | Excellent 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148  | Good 5.1%  | 
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149  | Good 5.2%  | 
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150  | Good 5.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151  | Good 5.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152  | Good 5.2%  | 
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153  | Good 5.2%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154  | Good 5.2%  |