Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,272,517 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 10.1% |
| Range | 6.6% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Immigrants from Hungary (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Spain (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 86.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 86.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 85.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 85.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 84.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |