Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Pakistan
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Pakistan
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,838,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Pakistan |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 12.5% |
| Range | 6.6% | 11.5% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Pakistan by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Indonesian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 85.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 84.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |