Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Asia
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Asia
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
81.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,060,579 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Asia |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 7.2% |
| Range | 6.6% | 6.3% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 0.92% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Asia by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Chile (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 84.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |