Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Italy
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Italy
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,002,453 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Italy |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 18.8% |
| Range | 6.6% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Italy by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Norway (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |