Filipino vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
COMPARE
Filipino
Zimbabwean
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Filipinos
Zimbabweans
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,275,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,106 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| Range | 7.7% | 7.6% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Zimbabweans by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |