Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Zimbabwean
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Yugoslavians
Zimbabweans
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,527,553 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,106 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 11.2% | 8.8% |
| Range | 9.8% | 7.6% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Zimbabweans by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |