Zimbabwean vs Cape Verdean Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Cape Verdean
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Cape Verdeans
15.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
24.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Cape Verdean Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,763,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,813,617 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 5.9%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 58.6% | 47.9% |
| Range | 53.8% | 44.4% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 17.9% |
| Median | 15.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 9.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Yaqui (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Barbados (16.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (16.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (16.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (16.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Guyana (16.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ukrainians | 30.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.4% |
| Russians | 30.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.4% |
| Latvians | 28.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 28.0 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 27.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 24.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 24.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.5% |
| Cape Verdeans | 24.4 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 21.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 20.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 16.5% |
| Romanians | 20.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 19.8 /100 | #199 | Poor 16.5% |
| Syrians | 17.4 /100 | #200 | Poor 16.6% |
| Cubans | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 16.6% |