Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Portuguese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Portuguese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Portuguese
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Portuguese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,364,700 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 1.8%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Portuguese |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 23.1% |
Range | 11.5% | 22.3% |
Mean | 8.4% | 8.7% |
Median | 8.1% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |