Nepalese vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Nepalese
Albanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Nepalese
Albanians
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,511,115 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,280,277 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 20.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nepalese | Albanian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 64.2% | 22.2% |
| Range | 61.7% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 20.5% | 11.4% |
| Median | 19.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nepalese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |