Turkish vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Turkish
Tsimshian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Turks
Tsimshian
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,582,938 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,568,381 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 42.3% |
| Range | 99.1% | 36.2% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 20.8% |
| Median | 12.7% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Tsimshian by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (14.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Norwegian (14.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese (14.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Latvian (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Moldova (14.5%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Laotian (14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Russian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Soviet Union (14.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Koreans | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Soviet Union | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Tsimshian | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.8% |