Turkish vs Russian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Russian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Russians
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Russian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,199,815 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Russian |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 20.9% | 50.0% |
Range | 18.0% | 49.2% |
Mean | 8.3% | 12.1% |
Median | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Russians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Cypriot (9.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Korean (9.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |