Turkish vs Immigrants from Serbia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Serbia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Serbia
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Serbia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,714,857 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Serbia |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 24.2% |
| Range | 18.0% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.6% |
| Median | 7.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Serbia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |