Turkish vs Polish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Polish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Poles
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Polish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,970,133 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Polish |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 46.0% |
| Range | 18.0% | 44.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 10.3% |
| Median | 7.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Poles by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |