Czech vs Russian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Russian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Russians
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Russian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,041,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,199,815 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.60%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Russian |
Minimum | 0.55% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 49.5% | 49.2% |
Mean | 9.5% | 12.1% |
Median | 8.7% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Russians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Cypriot (9.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Korean (9.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |