Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Immigrants from Malaysia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Immigrants from Malaysia
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,048,454 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.99%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 29.9% | 49.6% |
Range | 27.0% | 46.2% |
Mean | 13.6% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are French (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |