Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Asian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Asians
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,693,762 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 24.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Asian |
Minimum | 3.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 64.3% | 38.0% |
Range | 60.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 11.5% |
Median | 15.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Asians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |