Subsaharan African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
 Trinidadian and Tobagonian
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,618,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,718,536 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | 
| Minimum | 0.57% | 1.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 28.1% | 
| Range | 99.4% | 27.1% | 
| Mean | 21.1% | 13.0% | 
| Median | 14.9% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 10.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 14.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 5.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% | 
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% | 
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% | 
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |