South African vs New Zealander Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
New Zealander
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
New Zealanders
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs New Zealander Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3364/e33642e59a5952109f29f8be0aa2fa8ffa5316a8" alt="South African vs New Zealander Family Poverty"
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 19.9% |
Range | 28.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 7.0% | 7.4% |
Median | 6.0% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and New Zealanders by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |