Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Luxembourgers
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,952,607 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 52.1% |
| Range | 45.2% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 22.0% | 21.8% |
| Median | 20.6% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |