Seminole vs Yakama Male Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Yakama
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Yakama
14.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Yakama Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,283,543 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 7.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Yakama |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 42.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 40.3% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 16.6% |
| Median | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Yakama by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Somali (14.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Honduran (14.3%, a difference of 0.21%), African (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Dutch West Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and Choctaw (14.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |