Seminole vs Creek Male Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Creek
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Creek
14.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Creek Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,283,543 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,404,623 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 42.0% | 50.8% |
| Range | 40.3% | 48.5% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 17.8% |
| Median | 15.2% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Creek by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Somali (14.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Honduran (14.3%, a difference of 0.21%), African (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Dutch West Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and Choctaw (14.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Bangladesh (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Senegalese (14.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Bahamian (14.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Caribbean (14.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Senegal (14.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |