Puget Sound Salish vs Chilean Family Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Chilean
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Chileans
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Chilean Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,264,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.66%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Chilean |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 19.1% |
| Range | 23.9% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 8.0% |
| Median | 7.6% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Chileans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |