Puget Sound Salish vs South African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
South African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
South Africans
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs South African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | South African |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 23.9% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 7.0% |
| Median | 7.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and South Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |