Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Chilean Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Chilean
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Chileans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Chilean Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,264,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.92%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Chilean |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 19.1% |
| Range | 11.5% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 8.0% |
| Median | 8.1% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Chileans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |