Pennsylvania German vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Tsimshian
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.99%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 27.8% |
| Range | 96.6% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 19.5% | 14.0% |
| Median | 12.4% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.5% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |