Immigrants from Central America vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Tsimshian
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,791,715 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 28.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 27.8% |
| Range | 93.3% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 26.7% | 14.0% |
| Median | 20.4% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.6% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |