Paraguayan vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Czechoslovakian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Czechoslovakians
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,097,647 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paraguayan | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 24.2% | 32.3% |
| Range | 23.0% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and British (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |