European vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
COMPARE
European
Czechoslovakian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Czechoslovakians
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,757,214 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 32.3% |
| Range | 98.1% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 22.2% | 13.5% |
| Median | 14.5% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |