Pakistani vs British Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
British
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
British
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,177,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%.
![Pakistani vs British Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/pakistanis-vs-british-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | British |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 44.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.3% | 97.3% |
Mean | 14.0% | 18.5% |
Median | 12.7% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 16.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 18.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |