Immigrants vs Sudanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Sudanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Sudanese
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Sudanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,663,107 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.49%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Sudanese |
Minimum | 5.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 61.7% | 36.9% |
Range | 56.2% | 35.0% |
Mean | 10.8% | 11.5% |
Median | 10.2% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Sudanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |