Osage vs Sudanese Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Sudanese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Osage
Sudanese
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Sudanese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,120,634 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 3.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Sudanese |
Minimum | 2.8% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 40.5% |
Range | 26.1% | 39.8% |
Mean | 13.8% | 15.4% |
Median | 13.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Sudanese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alaskan Athabascan (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (14.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |