Nonimmigrants vs Central American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Central American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Central Americans
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Central American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Central American |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 65.2% |
| Range | 36.9% | 62.4% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 25.2% |
| Median | 20.7% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Central Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |