Malaysian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Micronesia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Micronesia
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,589,197 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Minimum | 0.81% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 26.3% |
Range | 25.6% | 22.1% |
Mean | 10.6% | 11.0% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Micronesia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |